Saturday, January 31, 2015

The Science (?) Behind Vaccines


In this age of social media, I cannot sit at my computer without seeing post after post concerning the safety, efficacy, and the general need for vaccines. The raging debate is front page news; whooping cough, Ebola, and now measles but the controversy is as old as vaccines themselves beginning with Edward Jenner’s smallpox claim. 

One of the more common comebacks from the pro-vaccine side is, “I don’t get my vaccine information from stay at home moms, Jenny McCarthy, Google, or a quack chiropractor. I’ll get my data from real scientists and doctors, thank you.” 

Let’s take a look at some recent news concerning the “science” behind vaccines.

Merck, a vaccine manufacturer, was exposed by two Merck virologists. They proved the company faked mumps vaccine efficacy results since the 1990s. Merck added animal antibodies to blood samples to achieve more favorable test results even though they knew that the human immune system would never produce such antibodies. Merck then used the falsified trial results to swindle the U.S. government out of hundreds of millions of dollars for a vaccine that does not provide adequate immunization. They used its false claims of "95% effectiveness" to monopolize the vaccine market and eliminate possible competitors. This entire fraud took place with the knowledge, authority, and approval of Merck's senior management.

Dr. Gregory Poland, the editor-in-chief of the medical journal Vaccine, professor of medicine and founder and leader of Mayo Clinic's Vaccine Research Group confessed in 2012, measles in highly immunized societies occurs primarily among those previously immunized." And herd immunity will never work because, "…eradication…of measles is unlikely as modeling studies suggest that herd immunity of approximately 95% or greater is required to eliminate persisting measles endemicity. However, even with two documented doses of measles vaccine, our laboratory demonstrated that 8.9% of 763 healthy children immunized a mean of 7.4 years earlier lacked protective levels of circulating measles-specific neutralizing antibodies, suggesting that even two doses of the current vaccine may be insufficient at the population level."

Here is the recent CDC whistle blower, Dr. William Thompson, who came forward and confessed to publishing fraudulent data to obfuscate the link between vaccines and autism. He wrote:

I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998. I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.

Package inserts for various flu vaccines (Flulaval for example) state “that there are no adequate and well controlled studies in pregnant women,” yet pregnant women are urged to receive the flu shot. And, “Flulaval has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential.” And then there is, "Safety and effectiveness of Flulaval in pediatric patients have not been established."

And here is the granddaddy of them all: “there have been no controlled trials adequately demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with Flulaval. How’s that for science?

The Journal of Infectious Disease told us in May 8, 2013 that vaccines simply do not confer the same kind of long lasting immunity that is obtained from experiencing and recovering from the natural disease because vaccine antibodies are different from naturally acquired measles antibodies.

Dr Hilleman, was the developer of Merck’s vaccine program, a member of the U.S. National Academy of Science, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the Institute of Medicine, and the American Philosophical Society. In a video that can be found on the internet, Dr. Hilleman admits Merck’s responsibility in releasing the polio vaccine contaminated with a cancer causing monkey virus. He also alludes to the fact that AIDS originated the same way.

The underlying ethical foundation of these giant pharmaceutical companies is built on fraud, lies, greed, and political maneuvering. As they continue to promote vaccines through deceit instead of science, they apply the same tactics with their entire menu of drugs. Remember, it is the same science that brought us Accutane, Baycol, Fen-Phen, Thalidomide, DES, Seldane, Actos, Depokate, Fosamax, Bextra, Vioxx, Rezulin, Posicor, PPA, Adderall, Lexapro, Topamax, Micturin, Propulsid, Zelnorm, Pradaxa, Yaz, Avandia, Paxill, Cylert, Darvon/Darvocet, Meridia, etc., etc., etc.

A Chinese court imposed a fine of nearly $500 million on GlaxoSmithKline for bribing hospitals and doctors, and channeling illicit kickbacks through travel agencies — a scheme that brought the company higher drug prices and illegal revenue of more than $150 million.

Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Abbott Laboratories were all fined billions of dollars for violating the False Claims Act using “off label promotions.” Many other pharmaceutical companies have paid hundreds of millions for the same crime. 

GlaxoSmithKline is a top 3 global vaccine manufacturer. They were fined $88,000 for the killing of 14 babies during illegal lab vaccine trials conducted between 2007 and 2008. Glaxo is now paying a criminal fine of $3 billion for misreporting efficacy data, failing to report adverse safety data, and defrauding Medicare and Medicaid out of billions of dollars. 

Hoffmann-La Roche, A Swiss pharmaceutical giant plead guilty and paid a record $500 million fine for leading a worldwide conspiracy to raise and fix prices and allocate market shares for certain vitamins sold in the United States.

And on and on and on…You see, the problem with information from governmental health agencies and pharmaceutical companies is that it is highly biased and frequently misleading. You will have to search well beyond these sources that aggressively promote vaccinations. And that may include stay at home moms, Jenny McCarthy, Google, and quack chiropractors.